You’re in “The Hidden Gaps”.
This is the most common position — and the most fixable.
What this score means
You’re not guessing. You have a real target, a plausible claim on it, and the commitment to make the move. What’s holding you back isn’t strategy or motivation — it’s one or two specific, nameable gaps that most people in this position don’t see clearly enough to fix.
That’s the trap: because nothing is obviously wrong, people in this band often keep doing more of what they’re already doing — more applications, more courses, more content — and wonder why the needle isn’t moving.
Where the leverage sits
For people in this band, the gaps almost always cluster around three patterns. Look at which sections you scored lowest — that’s where to start.
- The Visible Credibility Gap. You have the capability; the market can’t see it yet. Closing this typically doubles conversion on outreach — before you do any more of it.
- The Overlaps Map. You may be under-using the transferable credibility already in your past work — client type, org stage, product or service type. Making those overlaps visible is usually faster than building new evidence.
- Your Community Strength. The distance between you and the people making hiring decisions is probably larger than it needs to be. Closing it is less about networking and more about visible, recurring contact.
Suggested focus
Don’t do more of what you’ve been doing. The return on activity flattens in this band — the return on repositioning one or two of these dimensions is where the real compounding starts.
The next session — “Why Most Career Transitions Into Climate Fail” — walks through the specific patterns that keep people stuck in The Hidden Gaps, and what to do about them.
Roughly 45 minutes, live, with Q&A.
If this doesn’t quite feel like the right description of where you are, don’t ignore it. If you want a second view, get in touch.
Your Score Card - Explained
-
How sharply you've defined your target: the sector, the role, and the archetype of the person who'd be hiring you. Without this, every other dimension has nothing to test against — you can't measure credibility against a target you haven't named.
-
How testable your criteria are for "this is the right opportunity." The difference between "I'll know it when I see it" and a written list you could hand to a friend and ask them to filter roles on your behalf.
-
Whether you're changing what you do (content — role, function, skillset), where you do it (context — sector, organisation type, stage), or both at once. Dual shifts aren't impossible, but they need a different playbook and usually take longer.
-
The distance between the credibility you actually have and what's visible to an employer in the first 30 seconds of reading your CV or LinkedIn. This isn't about what you can do — it's about what they can see that you can do.
-
Your transferability across three axes: client type, organisation stage, and product-service type. Most people assume they lack relatable experience. This map shows you were you might find more overlap than you expect
-
Whether the market actually wants what you're offering, in the quantities and at the rates you need. Plenty of valid pivots stall here because the target role exists in smaller numbers — or at lower salary — than assumed.
-
How close you are to the people who make hiring decisions in your target space. Roles at this level rarely come from cold applications — they come through one or two degrees of separation, which means your community is load-bearing.
-
The relationship between your financial runway (how long you can afford the search) and realistic time-to-land at the pace you can work at it. Underestimating the second half of this equation is the single most common mistake in mid-career pivots.
-
How much you actually care about where you're heading. Pivots take nine to eighteen months of real, sustained effort. The motivation has to be more durable than "I'm unhappy here" — it has to be positive pull, not just negative push.